Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cppcheck suppressions set 56 #38744

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Cppcheck suppressions set 56 #38744

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

RichardWaiteSTFC
Copy link
Contributor

@RichardWaiteSTFC RichardWaiteSTFC commented Jan 29, 2025

Description of work

image

There is no associated issue. Part of cpp hackathon

Report to: @cailafinn

To test:

CI passes

This does not require release notes because will not affect the user


Reviewer

Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.

Code Review

  • Is the code of an acceptable quality?
  • Does the code conform to the coding standards?
  • Are the unit tests small and test the class in isolation?
  • If there is GUI work does it follow the GUI standards?
  • If there are changes in the release notes then do they describe the changes appropriately?
  • Do the release notes conform to the release notes guide?

Functional Tests

  • Do changes function as described? Add comments below that describe the tests performed?
  • Do the changes handle unexpected situations, e.g. bad input?
  • Has the relevant (user and developer) documentation been added/updated?

Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of @mantidproject/gatekeepers will take care of it.

Gatekeeper

If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.

RichardWaiteSTFC and others added 3 commits January 29, 2025 11:58
Py_RETURN_NONE renamed to Py_NONE and return removed (now to be done manually) as not used anywhere else and was confusing cppcheck with missing return.

Had to make lambda function wrapper if wanted to return const pointer in AlgorithmProperty.cpp

Co-authored-by: Mohamed Almaki <[email protected]>
@sf1919
Copy link
Contributor

sf1919 commented Jan 29, 2025

Cancelling other tests as it seems there are genuine failures

@sf1919 sf1919 added the Maintenance Unassigned issues to be addressed in the next maintenance period. label Jan 30, 2025
@sf1919 sf1919 added this to the Release 6.13 milestone Jan 30, 2025
AlgorithmProperty *createPropertyWithValidator(const std::string &name, IValidator *validator) {
return createPropertyWithValidatorAndDirection(name, validator, Mantid::Kernel::Direction::Input);
}
const std::function<const AlgorithmProperty *(const std::string &, const IValidator *)> createPropertyWithValidator =
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MohamedAlmaki this is causing build failures any idea why?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will check out

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It appears that Boost::Python is having a problem reading the signature of the function pointer. I will attempt to resolve the error on my Linux machine, and if that is not possible, I may revert the change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Unassigned issues to be addressed in the next maintenance period.
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants